Exposing Hindu God Brahma aka Incestuous God

[Do not use this article to hurt Hindu sentiments. This article is written only as a response to those Hindu fanatics who mock other religions. In such case you can use any of the passage.]

Brahma had sex with his own daughter Saraswati

Nothing is more disgusting than a Father having Sex with his own Daughter.The savage Vedic Aryans who invaded India practised widespread incest, cannibalism, sati and other barbarities. It is hence no surprise that the main Vedic god also displayed animal characteristics. He had incest with his own daughter, an act that is perfectly legal in Vedic law. Saraswati, who later became the wife of her own father, was actually the daughter of Brahma.First let me give you readers an overview about the relation of Brahma and Saraswati so that the picture will be clear to you.

Brahma is one of the 3 main gods – ‘Trimurti’ – of the Hindu pantheon. He is the creator of the universe as per Hindu scriptures. Saraswati, who became the wife of her own father, was the daughter of Brahma. There are 2 stories about her genesis in the `Saraswati Purana’. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati direct from his `vital strength’ or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma used to collect his semen in a pot whenever he masturbated fixing his carnal eyes on the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma’s semen in the pot gave birth to the sage Agastya, and Agastya in turn gave birth to Saraswati. Thus, Saraswati had no mother. This daughter or grand-daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning. When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her father’s passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions, but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma’s wish. Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest for 100 years. They had a son Swayambhumaru and a daughter Satarupa. Through the incest of Brahma’s son and daughter Brahma got two grandsons and two grand-daughters.

Reference Check-:[Brahma Purana 72:18; Vamana Purana 27:56-9; cf. Siva Purana, Jnanasamhita 18:62-8; Siva Purana 2:3:49:3-10; Skanda Purana 1:1:26:15-22.]

[You can also find the story of Brahma and Saraswati in Aitareya Brahmana.III.33 ; Satapatha Brahmana.I.7.4.1ff; XIV, 4.2.1ff; Matsya Purana.III.32 ff; Bhagavata Purana.III.12.28ff.]

Again,from another referrence we find that:

“Brahma’s daughter Sarasvati said to herself,“After begetting me from his own body, how could he copulate with me? I know, I’ll hide myself.’ So she became a cow. But he became a bull and copulated with her. From their union cattle were born. Then she became a mare, and he a stallion; she became a female donkey, and he, a male donkey. And again he copulated with her, and from their union one-hoofed animals were born. Then she became a female goat, and he, a male goat; she became an ewe, and he, a ram. And again he copulated with her, and from their union goats and sheep were born. In this way he created every male and female pair that exists, down to the very ants.… Then he churned like this and, using his hands, produced fire from his mouth as from a vagina. As a result the inner sides of both these — the hands and the mouth — are without hair, for the inside of the vagina is without hair.” — [Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 1:4:2-6]

It’s so shameful that this Hindu God Brahma has to copulate or have sex with his creation to produce all the living things on earth. Yuck!! such a shameless God Hindus worship.

Wise, teaching, following the thought of Order, the sonless gained a grandson from his daughterFain, as a sire, to see his child prolific, he sped to meet her with an eager spirit.”[Rig ved 3:31:1]

Brahma, the main god of the Vedic religion, was so lecherous that he was not satisfied with his own daughter. In fact, feelings of lust crept up when he saw even females of animal species ! He was so frustrated that he copulated with a bear.Check in Puranas to find about this.

Next we find Hindu God Brahma giving birth to Demons and Asuras. Read the passage below:

Srimad Bhagavatam 3.20.23 ”Lord Brahmā then gave birth to the demons from his buttocks, and they were very fond of sex. Because they were too lustful, they approached him for copulation.” Tr. Swami Prabhupada

Brahmanda Purana I.2.8.25 Since the lord [Brahma] created the Asuras at night from his loins through the vital breaths, and as they were born during the night, they are invincible during the night.

I have never heard how can anybody give birth to babies from buttocks and loins. It’s beyond my understanding.And on the top of that if that being is male.

As per Hindu texts, Brahma had incestuous relationship with his own daughter Saraswati. Such an act was done by the creator Brahma. There are different versions of this story. Saraswati is Brahma’s consort and it’s mentioned in Puranas, As per Skanda Purana III.i.41.98-99 Brahma had two wives Gayatri and Saraswati. As I said earlier, there are several versions to this story. Some text says that Brahma was married to Saraswati and some say he had incestuous relationship without marriage. Some say Brahma cohabited with Saraswati for the propagation after marrying her and some say he cohabited with her for propagation without marriage, verses which talks about Brahma’s relationship with Saraswati for propagation doesn’t view the relationship as sinful. Some text says that Brahma and Saraswati were greeted and welcomed after their marriage and some text says that Brahma was punished for having an affair with his own daughter. Following verse shows Brahma’s marriage with his daughter Saraswati and how they were welcomed in Brahma-loka,

Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda 35.8-20 “…Then he came and bowed to me; and having secured Saraswati, the enchantress of the three worlds, as his bride Brahma dallied with her in several places in solitude. After a good deal of diversion, he desisted from his amours and came back to Brahma-loka…Then they performed auspicious rites, greeted Brahman and the goddess Bharati, gladly ushered them in into the land of Brahma. Brahma sported with her day and night and was absorbed in sexual enjoyments…” Tr. Rajendra Nath Sen

Brahmanas speaks of this illicit relationship proudly,

Pancavimsa Brahmana 8.2.10 Prajapati went on top of his own daughter Usas. His semen flew away. It was poured on this (the earth). He made it perfect, [thinking]: ”Let this [Semen] of mine not be spoiled.” He made it [something] real, namely, cattle.

Aitareya Brahmana 6.5.27 For the semen is like something unspeakable secretly poured forth into the womb. The sperm becomes blended. For when Prajapati had carnal intercourse with his daughter, his sperm was poured forth upon the earth (and was mixed up with it. This was done for making the sperm produce fruit.

Matsya Purana 3.43-44 “Brahma, fired with passion in her company, married Satarupa and began to pass his days in enjoyment inside a lotus. He enjoyed the company of Savitri for hundred years, and after a long time Manu was born to them.” Tr. Taluqdar of Oudh, edited by B.D. Basu

The chapter 4 of Matsya Purana justifies this act of Brahma saying that Devas beget progeny in quite different ways.The other version of this story is that, Brahma had incestuous relationship with his daughter in order to create living beings,

Birhadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.3 “He was not at all happy. Therefore people (still) are not happy when alone. He desired a mate. He became as big as man and wife embracing each other. He parted this very body into two. From that came husband and wife. Therefore, said Yajnavalkya, this (body) is one-half of oneself, like one of the two halves of a split pea. Therefore this space is indeed filled by the wife. He was united with her. From that men were born.” Tr. Swami Madhavananda

Adi Shankaracharya writes on this verse,

”He, the Viraj called Manu, was united with her, his daughter called Satarupa, whom he conceived of as his wife. From that union men were born.” Adi Shankaracharya on Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.3, Tr. Swami Madhavananda.

The next verse 1.4.4 says she ran away and became different animals and Prajapati assumed the male forms of those animals and had sex (read rape) with her thence all such creatures were born, So this shows that creation took place after Prajapati raped his daughter.It seems that Hindu God couldn’t find other ways of creating living creatures.Creation after father having sex with daughter is also supported by the Vedas,

Rig Veda 10.61.5-7 (Rudra), the benefactor of man, whose eager virile energy was developed, drew it back when disseminated (for the generation of offspring)again the irresistible (Rudra) concentrates (the energy) which was communicated to his maiden daughter. When the deed was done in mid-heaven in the proximity of the father working his will, and the daughter coming together, they let the seed fall slightly; it was poured upon the high place of sacrifice. When the father united with the daughter, then associating with the earth, he sprinkled it with the effusion[Semen]: then the thoughtful gods begot Brahma : they fabricated the lord of the hearth (of sacrifice) ; the defender of sacred rites.

Some Hindus says that these verses from Vedas are allegorical. I am not talking about whether these verses are allegorical or not although Panchavimsha and Aitareya Brahmana (mentioned above which are commentaries of these verses) doesn’t explain it allegorically, But I am concerned about the obscenity promoted in Vedas. Was Ishwar short of words that he used such vulgar words in Vedas? Why can’t he use some nice poetry if he wants to convey a message? There is no doubt that these verses promote incest between father and daughter, If Hindus don’t agree then they should furnish reference from Vedas wherein Ishwar prohibits incest between father and daughter. Another version shows that Brahma divided himself into two parts a male and a female and creatures were born from these two after their union,

Shiva Purana, Vayaviyasamhita 7, Section I, chapter 17.1-4 “Securing the great and eternal Sakti from the lord and desiring to initiate the process of procreation by copulation, Brahma become a wondrous man in one half and a woman in one half. From the woman half was born Satarupa. The man half created Viraja, called Svayambhuva Manu, the first creation. Performing a difficult penance the gentle Satarupa got the Manu of bright fame as her husband.” Tr. J.L. Shastri

Brahmanda Purana 1.2.9.32-38a “Brahma discarded his own shining physical body. After dividing his own body into two, he became a man by on half. By (another) half he became a woman and she was Satarupa. She was the Prakrti, the mother of all living beings (and manifested thus) because the lord was creating out of desire. ..The half that was created as a woman became Satarupa. That divine lady performed a very difficult penance for a hundred thousand years and obtained Purusa of brilliant fame as her husband. Indeed, he is called Manu, the Purusa, the earlier son of the self-born lord…After obtaining as his wife, Satarupa who was not born of any womb, the Purusa sported with her. Hence it is called Rati (sexual dalliance).” Tr. G.V. Tagare

Some stories also says that it was Brahma’s son and daughter who had incestuous relationship for propagation,

Devi Bhagavatam 3.13.15-16 “Next Svayambhava Manu sprang from the lower half of Brahma; and the daughter named Satarupa came out of the left hand side of the Brahma’s body. The two sons Priyavrata and Uttânapâda were born of Manu in the womb of S’atarûpâ and the three daughters, very beautiful and fair complexioned, were also born of him.” Tr. Swami Vijnananda

Srimad Bhagvatam 4.1.1 Sri Maitreya said: Svayambhuva Manu begot three daughters in his wife Satarupa, and their names were Akuti, Devahuti and Prasuti.

Swami Prabhupada writes on this verse:

“…The Supreme Lord Himself does the real creation by agitating His material energy, and then, by His order, Brahma, the first living creature in the universe, attempts to create the different planetary systems and their inhabitants, expanding the population through his progeny, like Manu and other progenitors of living entities, who work perpetually under the order of the Supreme Lord…Svayambhuva Manu was the son of Brahma. Brahma had many other sons, but Manu’s name is specifically mentioned first because he was a great devotee of the Lord. In this verse there is also the word ca, indicating that besides the three daughters mentioned, Svayambhuva Manu also had two sons.” http://vanisource.org/wiki/SB_4.1.1

Swami Prabhupada on Srimad Bhagavatam

Srimad Bhagavatam 3.12.48 “…His transcendental value is not to be minimized, even though he exhibited a tendency to enjoy his own daughter. There is a purpose for the exhibition of such a tendency by Brahmā, and he is not to be condemned like an ordinary living entity.” http://vanisource.org/wiki/SB_3.12.48

A version of Kausitaki shows that Brahma’s sons were attracted to their sister and Kausitaki Brahamana also finds no problem in this act,

Kausitaki Brahmana 6.1.1-12 “Prajapati, being desirous of propagation, underwent penance; from him when heated were born five, Agni, Vayu, Adityaa, Candramas, and Usas as fifth. He said to them, ‘Do ye also practise fervour.’ They consecrated themselves; then when they had consecrated themselves and had acquired fervour, Usas, offspring of Prajapati, taking the form of an Apsaras, came out in front of them; to her their minds inclined; they poured out seed; they went to Prajapati, their father, and said, ‘We have poured out seed; let it not remain here’. Prajapati made a golden bowl, an arrow breadth in height and similar in breadth; in it he poured the seed; then arose he of a thousand eyes, of a thousand feet, with a thousand fitted (arrows).” Tr. A.B. Keith

Other versions shows that Brahma was punished for having an affair with his own daughter,

Satapatha Brahmana 1.7.4.1-3 Prajapati set his mind on his own daughter, either Sky or Dawn. ‘May I pair with her,’ [he wished. He made love to her. That indeed was a sin for the gods: ‘He who acts thus towards his own daughter, our sister, [commits a sin].’ Those gods then said to this god who is lord of cattle. ‘An act of transgression he commits who acts thus towards his own daughter, our sister. Pierce him.’ Rudra, having aimed [him], pierced him. In the middle [of the act, his semen spurted forth. Thus indeed it was.

Matryani Samhita (4.214 [35, 11-15]) Prajapati desired his own daughter Usas, she became a red deer, [and he,] having assumed a buck, went on top of her. Prajapati set his mind on Usas, his own daughter. She, having become a deer, stood still for him. He, having become a buc, jumped on her. he (rudra-agni) reflected: ”For this have the gods produced me, for supervision. This one (Prajapati) transgesses. Let me pierce him.” He pierced him. Pierced, he threw off this [buck] appearance and rose upwards.

Aitareya Brahmana 3.33.1-4 The gods saw him (Prajapati). ‘Prajapati does what is not done.’ They sought one who would hit him. They could not find this [god] amongst one another. Their most dreadful forms they gathered into one. Brought together, those [forms] became (abhavat) this god. Therefore there is this name of his (i.e., Bhutapati) that contains [the word] Bhuta. He thrives if he thus knows this name of his. To him the gods said: ”Prajapti here has done what is not done. Pierce him.” ‘So be it.’ He said. ”Let me choose a boon from you.” ”Choose,” [They said]. He chose this very boon: overlordship of cattle (Pasu}. Therefore there is this name of his (Pasupati) that contains [the word] Pasu. As an owner of cattle he thrives, if he thus knows this name of his.

Skanda Purana III.i.40.6-12 “Prajpati (i.e. Brahma) was formerly deluded, O Brahmanas. He desired like a lover of his own daughter named Vac (Speech) joyously. This daughter of Prajapati became ashamed on noticing his lecherous love for her. Hence she assumed the form of a Rohita deer. Inclined to have sexual dalliance with her, Brahma too took the form of a deer. As she went ahead in the guise of a female deer, he too followed her. On seeing him intent on having sexual intercourse with his daughter, all the deities condemned him: ‘This Brahma is committing a deed that should not be done, i.e. (attempt to have) sexual union with one’s own daughter.’ Thus they censured the creator and the Lord of the worlds. On seeing Paramesthin (Brahma) engaged in the forbidden act, Lord Hara took up the Pinaka bow and assumed the form of a hunter. He fitted one arrow to his bow. He drew the bow string as far as his ear and hit Brahma with his sharp arrow. Struck down by the arrow of the Annihilator of the three Puras, Brahma fell down on the ground.” Tr. G.V. Tagare

Brahma ejaculated on seeing the face of his own daughter:

Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Sati Khanda 2, Ch 19.26-28 ”Then, O sage, afflicted by the cupid and delighted in the heart of hearts, I [Brahma] lifted her veil and stared into the face of Sati. I looked at the face of Sati many a time. I was helpless in curbing the onset of a sensuous organism. Four drops of my semen virile got displaced and fell on the ground like drops of dew as a result of staring into her face.”, Tr. Board of Scholars, Edited by J.L. Shastri

This story is also supported by Brahma Purana Gautami-Mahatmya 3.15. As we all know Brahma was an old man, he is sometimes considered the grandfather. But this grandfather couldn’t even resist his desire seeing his granddaughter. He discharged semen after seeing the face of Sati the wife of Shiva. Shiva knew this and he became so angry that he was about to kill Brahma, but later Brahma repented and begged for forgiveness. Then Shiva forgave Brahma. Isn’t it ironic that Shiva became angry just because Brahma ejaculated on seeing his wife but Shiva had no problem at all commanding Vishnu to go and rape the chaste lady named Vrinda (Tulsi). As we already have seen above that even Shiva ejaculated on seeing Mohini. When Shiva can do all these shameless things then why get angry when someone else does the same thing with your wife? Hindu gods did the same act again and again, they did not consider it to be wrong.

Brahma had again ejaculated on seeing a nymph,

Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda 131.2-10 Subsequently at that place nymphs who had sprung out of the body of Visnu and who were the digits of Visnu began to dance and chant Visnu’s hymns in a melodious tone. The paternal grandfather Brahma, observing their hard buttocks, thick spherical breasts and smiling lotus faces, was excited with passion. He could not control his heart; his semen was discharged; and out of shame he concealed it on the ground with his cloth. O Saunaka, after the music was over, he threw the semen along with the cloth rendered hot by lust into the sea of milk.” Tr. Rajendra Nath Sen

Is it befitting for gods to watch girls dancing? That too wearing such cloths or no cloths at all? This gathering was also attended by Agni and he is also said to have discharged his semen and tried to hide it in similar way.

Brahma is the main god of the Hindu religion as expounded by the Smarta pantheists. He is one of the Hindu (ie. Smarta) trinity of Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva. Brahma is also Brahman, the Supreme Infinite God. Yet, Vishnu is himself considered merely another manifestation of Brahman or Brahma. Brahma in the form of Prajapati is the creator of the Universe in the Vedic religion. He is hence the most important Vedic god, towering like a colossus above Vishnu and Rudra (later on Rudra was identified with the Dravidian Shiva). The beastly behaviour of this God is thus especially significant, and shows how the rotten nature of Hinduism extends to the very foundation.

“Prajapati(Brahma) desired his daughter( SARASWATI) and made love to her. This was a sin in the eyes of the gods, who said to the god who rules over beasts [Pasupati, Rudra], ‘He commits a sin, acting in this way towards his own daughter, our sister. Pierce him.’ Rudra took aim and pierced him. Half his seed fell to the ground. The gods cured Prajapati and cut out Rudra’s dart, for Prajapati is the sacrifice. To utilize [the seed], the gods said, ‘Take care that this may not be lost, but that it may be less than the oblation.’ They gave it to Bhaga to eat, but it burnt his eyes and he became blind. Then they gave it to Pusan to eat, but it knocked out his teeth. At last they gave it to Savitr [the sun] and it did not injure him, for he appeased it.” —Ref : Satapatha Brahmana 1:7:4:1-7.

Another passage from Rigved says that Brahma married his daughter:

“Wise, teaching, following the thought of Order, the sonless gained a grandson from his daughter. Fain, as a sire, to see his child prolific, he sped to meet her with an eager spirit.”[Rig ved 3:31:1]

The following ‘sacred’ Vedic texts says further on this issue:

Aitareya Brahmana.III.33 ; Satapatha Brahmana.I.7.4.1ff; XIV, 4.2.1ff;
Matsya Purana.III.32 ff; Bhagavata Purana.III.12.28ff.

Justification of Incest is scattered all over in Hindu Scriptures.In all these `holy’ scriptures, this act of unrestrained incest is justified and upheld as a legal act ! ” Brahma followed Savitri [ Saraswati ], married her, and they lived together in a lotus for one hundred years. The Purana [ Matsya ] then points out that no question arises regarding prohibited acts of the gods since they do not reap the fruits of their karma (actions) as do mortals. A further justification of Brahma’s action is given by noting that Brahma is the lord of the Vedas and Savitri is the goddess of the Vedas. They therefore are inseparable, and to unite the Vedas with the sacred prayer can surely be no evil.”

However, the Vedas, which carry far more authority than the Puranic and Brahmanic texts cited above, enjoin this practice. Incest, far from being a `corruption’ introduced after the Vedic Dark Ages, was thus a common practice during that age of barbarism and illiteracy, and is a Hindu institution perfectly sanctioned in the Vedas.

One of the most irrefutable facts proving that Hinduism is evil right at its very foundation is the fact that the Vedas justify the beastly act of incest as a `sacred act’. This was no doubt an outcome of the strict practice of `brahmacharya’ which produced hoards of sexually starved psychopathic sadhus. It is these mad sadhu Brahmins, the authors of the concocted Vedas, who justified and legalised incast. Indeed, the Vedas enjoin incest as a kind of marriage. This fact was utilised by Brahma when convincing his daughter Sarasvati (also known as Padma) to succumb to his unlimited lust :

”  On seeing his beautiful daughter Padma, Brahma was sexually excited. He wooed his daughter and wanted to copulate with her. How could a daughter give consent to her own father? Padma refused. Brahma could not give up his desire. He began to quote the Vedas to convince her that there was nothing wrong in having sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a child. ”
— ( Puran )

This is the Vedic verse in Sanskrit which justifies incest and which was quoted by Brahma :

“Mathara Mupathya, susara Mupatithe, Puthrartheetha.
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham.
Matharam suransathee Rehathee”
– ( Veda, cited in Puran )

Tranlated this verse means
” For the sake of a child one can enjoy his own sister or daughter, without any sin attached to it. ”
( Puran )

There are other abundant examples of incest from the Vedic age. These prove that the Vedic Aryans regularly practiced incest of the father-daughter type and the brother-sister type ( Sita ). Moreover, the Vedas fully legalise this abominable practice. These evil practices continued right throughout the Brahmanic Dark Ages of 2599 years (1500 BC – 1000 AD).

After having hardcore sex with his daughter his lust didn’t fulfilled.Brahma committed sex with a bear. We call it Beastiality with a Bear. Read the passage below:

Brahma, the main god of the Vedic religion, was so lecherous that he was not satisfied with his own daughter. In fact, feelings of lust crept up when he saw even females of animal species ! He was so frustrated that he copulated with a bear :
” 11. Brahma started roaming about in forests. He happened to see a female bear in a bush. Brahma would not leave it. He went straight to the bear. The female bear yielded to Brahma’s lust. God Brahma enjoyed the bear, and a human being with the head of a bear was born. He was called Jambu Vandan, the son of Brahma.
( Puran )

Other examples of beastiality abound. The Vedic Ashvamedha involved the Chief Hindu Aryan Queen copulating with a dead horse ! Rama’s mother herself copulated with a dead horse during the asvamedha ceremony of King Dasaratha, after which she was handed over to the disciples of the officiating Brahmin, one of whom fathered Ram. Thus, Rama was illegitimate ( Mother ) ( Ram ).

Birth of Vasishta

Vasistha, so acclaimed as a sage, was the son of a prostitute, and thus fulfilled the dictionary definition of `*******ness’.

” 9. Brahma succeeded in convincing his daughter with the help of the Veda and enjoyed her. Brahma’s semen entered the womb of his daughter. But somehow, for reasons not known he sucked back his semen from the womb of his daughter, through his own penis…

” 12. Then Brahma met Urvasi a divine prostitute. He was erotically aroused by her beauty. He wooed her and had sex with her on a condition. Accordingly after enjoying her, he pumped back the semen sucked from the womb of his daughter Padma into the womb of Urvasi. The child born was named Vasista. Brahma transferred his powers to Vasista and went away to perform penance for his sinful sexual exploits.”
( Puran )

Birth of Agastya

Agastya, the priest who helped Rama during his genocidal invasion of South India, did not have any mother. He simply sprang out of Brahma’s semen that had accumulated :
” 1. Brahma acted as a priest to officiate the marriage of god Paramasiva with Parvathi. When Parvathi went round the sacred fire (Omakundam) she held up the end of her apron in her left hand. It enabled Brahma to have a clear look at Parvathi’s thighs. On seeing her thighs, Brahma ejaculated his semen in a vessel nearby. Agasthiar was delivered out of the vessel!
2. When Parvathi came around the sacred fire Brahma was once again blessed, with the beautiful sight of her thighs and he once again ejaculated. This time a number of saints (Rishis) were born in no time. Of them Valkilliyatha was one.

3. As Brahma left the place after the marriage, he once again secreted the semen and dripped it on the ashes of a graveyard. A Rakshasa named Pooricharavanan was born.

4. Brahma collected some bones from a burial ground and ejaculated on the heap of the bones. Instantly a brave and strong man called Salliyan was born.

5. As he left the grave yard a little quantity of semen spilled on the ground. A bird appeared there and pecked at the semen of Brahma. The bird became pregnant and gave birth to a man called sakuni.

6. Then god Brahma went to a tank. He pumped a little of his semen there. A frog came and swallowed the semen of Brahma. The frog gave birth to a female child called Mandothari.

7. At last Brahma emptied the last drops of his semen on a lotus flower in a tank. The lotus flower became pregnant and gave birth to a female child called Padma. ”
( Puran )

Surely, Brahma was a good guide for the debauched Brahmins enjoying themselves with thousands of Aboriginal Devadasis in their huge whorehouse-temples ! It is in these brothel-mandirs that Sanskrit arose as a mongrel language, the ******* offspring of the nomadic gruntings of Old Indo-Aryan and the Dravidian langauges. Indeed, more than 30 % of Sanskrit vocabulary is of Dravidian origin ! The common Sanskrit ending -am (as in Kalpakkam) is also derived from Dravidian, as are the cerebral consonants. Indeed, in all ways in which Sanskrit deviates from the Indo-Aryan mainstream it is Dravidian influence which is almost definitely at work.

Other shameless deeds by Brahma like masturbation and illegal sex

Agastya, the priest who helped Rama during his genocidal invasion of South India, did not have any mother. He simply sprang out of Brahma’s semen that had accumulated. Brahma met Urvasi a divine prostitute. He was erotically aroused by her beauty. He wooed her and had sex with her on a condition. Accordingly after enjoying her, he pumped back the semen sucked from the womb of his daughter Padma into the womb of Urvasi. The child born was named Vasista. Brahma transferred his powers to Vasista and went away to perform penance for his sinful sexual exploits.

Brahma acted as a priest to officiate the marriage of god Paramasiva with Parvathi. When Parvathi went round the sacred fire (Omakundam) she held up the end of her apron in her left hand. It enabled Brahma to have a clear look at Parvathi’s thighs. On seeing her thighs, Brahma ejaculated his semen in a vessel nearby. Agasthiar was delivered out of the vessel!When Parvathi came around the sacred fire Brahma was once again blessed, with the beautiful sight of her thighs and he once again ejaculated. This time a number of saints (Rishis) were born in no time. Of them Valkilliyatha was one.As Brahma left the place after the marriage, he once again secreted the semen and dripped it on the ashes of a graveyard. A Rakshasa named Pooricharavanan was born. Brahma collected some bones from a burial ground and ejaculated on the heap of the bones. Instantly a brave and strong man called Salliyan was born.As he left the grave yard a little quantity of semen spilled on the ground. A bird appeared there and pecked at the semen of Brahma. The bird became pregnant and gave birth to a man called sakuni. Then god Brahma went to a tank. He pumped a little of his semen there. A frog came and swallowed the semen of Brahma. The frog gave birth to a female child called Mandothari. At last Brahma emptied the last drops of his semen on a lotus flower in a tank. The lotus flower became pregnant and gave birth to a female child called Padma.

You can find about these in Puranas. I beg your pardon my reader that I couldn’t give exact referrence of all this.If you want to enquire you can read Puranas and check for referrences.

Another place in Puranas we find that Shiva punishing Brahma. Shiva, the Dravidian God, was naturally enraged at this profligate conduct of the savage Aryan Brahma. Hence, he cut of Brahma’s head.The news about god Brahma and his lustful extravagances reached the ears of king of devas-Devendra. He was excited and sent Thilothama, a dancing girl of Devalok, to dance before Brahma. She did so. Much enamoured of the beauty of Thilothama Brahma followed Thilothama to rape her. God Eswara observed the madness of Brahma. He got angry and cut away one of the heads of Brahma.

In all the so-called holy scriptures of Hindus, this act of unrestrained incest is justified and upheld as a legal act!In Puran we read that,”For the sake of a child one can enjoy his own sister or daughter, without any sin attached to it”.It’s totally sanctioned in Hinduism to commit incest.Shame and sick indeed!!One of the most irrefutable facts proving that Hinduism is evil right at its very foundation is the fact that the Vedas justify the beastly act of incest as a `sacred act’. This was no doubt an outcome of the strict practice of `brahmacharya’ which produced hoards of sexually starved psychopathic sadhus. It is these mad sadhu Brahmins, the authors of the concocted Vedas, who justified and legalised incast. Indeed, the Vedas enjoin incest as a kind of marriage. This fact was utilised by Brahma when convincing his daughter Saraswati (also known as Padma) to succumb to his unlimited lust.There are other abundant examples of incest from the Vedic age. These prove that the Vedic Aryans regularly practiced incest of the father-daughter type and the brother-sister type. Moreover, the Vedas fully legalise this abominable practice. These evil practices continued right throughout the Brahmanic Dark Ages of 2599 years (1500 BC – 1000 AD).

The impact of Brahma can be seen today in all parts of Hindu India : the incidence of fathers raping their daughters is higher in Hindu Bharat than in any other country of the world ! If a girl is not killed in Vedic female infanticide, she has to face the lustful advances of her debauched Hindu father ! And to top it all, such acts of infantilism are legalised in the Vedas ! That is all done before she is 9 years old, at which time she is married as per the Manu-Smrti. After that she may be burnt for dowry. If she by some miracle survives that, she is burnt as a widow ! The life of a Hindu woman is merely a series of tortures and rapings !

Legalised incest between father-daughter and brother-sister as depicted by the beastliness of the supreme Hindu God Brahma is merely one manifestation of the cess-pit of Vedic Hinduism masquerading as a religion. Cannibalism, urine-drinking, dung-eating, castration of Aboriginal males (Hijrah cult), sati (widow-burning), devadasism (Aryan Hindu sexploitation of Abroginal women), human sacrifice (purushamedha), Kautilyan totalitarianism and apartheid (varnashrama dharma) are some of the other gruesome gifts of Hinduism to the world.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s